Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12102 (ALL)

SURAJ PAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 21 OTHERS

WRIC/4939/2025 · 2025-02-18

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23777-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4939 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suraj Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 21 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Brij Napit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated January 7, 2025 filed by him. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Hathras is directed to treat the aforesaid representation of the petitioner filed before him and pass a reasoned order upon the same within a period of eight weeks from date, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad