MUNI MAN RANJAN DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/933/2025 · 2025-02-05
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7355 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 933 of 2025 Applicant :- Muni Man Ranjan Dubey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Pandey,Vinit Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) FTC/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Ayodhya in complaint case No. 3021 of 2023 "Dr. Sarvesh Kumar Verma Vs. Muni Man Ranjan Dubey". After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this application with liberty to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court and the same may be decided by the learned trial court in a time bound manner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed providing that in case, the petitioner moves an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned Court below within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months in accordance with law, by the concerned trial court. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench