Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120956 (ALL)

SMT. SHANTI DEVI v. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTED REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS

A227/646/2025 · 2025-02-12

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8973 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Shanti Devi Respondent :- District Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission, Sultanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Anurag Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- "(i). To direct the opposite party no. 1, District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissioner, Sultanpur to decide the complaint case no. 78/2021 (Smt. Shanti Devi Versus State Bank of India and another), which is pending since 21.08.2021 in accordance with law within stipulated time." 3. Considering the aforesaid prayer, it is directed that the trial court shall endeavour to decide the aforesaid pending complaint case with all expedition, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of copy of this order. 4. The petition is finally disposed of, in terms of above. Order Date :- 12.2.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench