PRIANKA (MINOR) THRU. FATHER SRI CHUNNU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION, LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/949/2025 · 2025-02-11
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8688 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 949 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prianka (Minor) Thru. Father Sri Chunnu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Taufiq Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2, Mr. Ranvijay Singh learned counsel for opposite party No.3 and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh learned counsel for opposite party No.4. In view of order being passed notice to opposite party No.5 stands dispensed with. On 31.1.2025 following order had been passed:-
"1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.4. At present notice to opposite party no.5 stands dispensed with and may be issued, if required. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for release of amount in favour of petitioner for purpose of text books, school uniform, school bag etc. which was to be credited in the Bank Account of her parents. A further prayer for a direction to opposite parties for fee reimbursement at the rate of Rs.450/- per month has also been sought. 3. Learned counsel for opposite party no.4 on the basis of instructions submits that vide order dated 30.01.2025, the fund has already been released to the School concerned for purposes of prayer no.1. 4. With regard to prayer no.2, it is submitted that fee reimbursement is to be made to school concerned and not to the students. 5. In view thereof, list this case on 11.02.2025, as fresh. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner shall obtain instructions with regard to fulfillment of prayer no.1." Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh learned counsel for opposite party No.4 on the basis of instructions submits that the amount for disbursement with regard to prayer No.1 has already been sanctioned and sent to respective districts whereafter actual disbursement to the beneficiaries shall be made upon
recommendation being made by the committee for the said purpose. It is submitted that at least six weeks time will be taken for the aforesaid purpose.
It is also submitted that in case petitioner's case is recommended by the said committee, reimbursement with regard to prayer No.1 would be made within the time prescribed. In view of aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for opposite party No.4, the petition is disposed of granting liberty to petitioner to approach this Court again in case such reimbursement with regard to prayer No.1 is not made within a period of two months from today. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench