GAUTAM TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE EDUCATION/RESEARCH LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
/1346/2025 · 2025-01-31
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6692 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1346 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gautam Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Education/Research Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Ramesh Babu,Rameshwar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 & 7 and Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 6. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the petitioner pension and other retiral benefits by counting his past services rendered on daily wage basis prior to his regularisation. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 i.e. Vice - Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, District - Ayodhya which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsels for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench