NITIN KUMAR SINGH v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER SULTANPUR AND 68 OTHERS
WRIC/1004/2025 · 2025-02-10
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8296-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1004 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Singh Respondent :- District Magistrate/Chief Revenue Officer Sultanpur And 68 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishnu Pratap Singh,Shiv Shankar Mishra,Shivanshi Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner claims to have been granted a lease for fishery rights in respect of a pond situated on Plot No. 1495 (Jha) at Village - Banke Gaon, Pargana - Aldemau, Tehsil - Kadipur, District - Sultanpur. However, it is alleged that the private opposite parties are interfering in his rights. Let the petitioner approach the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kadipur raising a grievance who may get the facts verified, as also, hear out the private opposite parties and see as to what is the dispute about. If he finds that there is a dispute which he can resolve and has jurisdiction to do so, then he shall do the needful, otherwise, the parties shall be at liberty to pursue remedies as may be prescribed in law. He shall also see as to whether any proceedings for partition of the relevant gata are pending before the Chief Revenue Officer, as informed by the Counsel for the Gaon Sabha. If so, whether there is any interim
order therein which has a bearing on the fishery rights of the petitioner? The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench