SARSABAI DADA KUSEKAR v. RAJESH SURESH CHAURSIYA AND OTHERS
WP/3482/2016 · 2025-01-17
Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12093 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12093 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
wp3482-16.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2016 Sarsabai Dada Kusekar PETITIONER VERSUS Rajesh Suresh Chaursiya and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. A. K. Shingare h/f Mr. K. F. Shingare, Advocate for Petitioner Mrs. P. V. Diggikar, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Vishal A. Bagdiya, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....… [CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.]
DATE : 17
th JANUARY, 2025
ORDER :
1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner as well as Respondent No.2 submit that the present proceedings arise out of land acquisition proceedings filed before the Reference Court where the Petitioner had filed application for transfer of the matter to other Court, which was rejected by the District Judge, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition.
2. Learned advocates submit that the Land Acquisition Reference itself has been disposed of and hence the present Writ Petition has become infructuous and, as such, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition.
3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] JUDGE
drp/wp3482-16.doc 2025:BHC-AUG:1352