Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12091 (RAJ)

RAVI KUMAR SWAMI S/O SHRI BHAIRULAL SWAMI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3911/2025 · 2025-03-19

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12433] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3911/2025 Ravi Kumar Swami S/o Shri Bhairulal Swami, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Plot No. 136, Ganesh Nagar, Pannadhay Circle, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/03/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.358/2024, registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(2), 125, 131, 352, 351(2) & 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that FIR has been registered in this matter on the basis of information, received by the Police from informant that there is firing between two groups. He further submits that it is a case of no injury as none of the person has sustained any injury. He argues that co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by this Court. He further argues that there is one criminal against the petitioner, wherein he has been acquitted by the [2025:RJ-JP:12433] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3911/2025] learned trial Court. He contends that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and especially the fact that it is a case of no injury, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) (Raj.) in FIR No.358/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Ravi Kumar Swami S/o Shri Bhairulal Swami, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-184