Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1209 (CHH)

DURGESH NANDINI MARAWI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/97/2025 · 2025-01-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1082-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 97 of 2025 1 - Durgesh Nandini Marawi D/o C.S. Marawi, Aged About 25 Years, Presently working as ADPO Raipur R/o Sr. MIG 104, Vijeta Complex, New Rajendra Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary (Law), Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - C.G. Public Service Commission Through its Secretary, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - High Court of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General, Bilaspur, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General and Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivatava, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08-01-2025 1. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief(s):- “10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the instant case. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the amendment so far providing enrollment as eligibility criteria in rule 7 in Lower Judicial Service Rule 2006 vide Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 notification dt. 5.7.2024, and consequent advetisement of PSC,in the interest of Justice. 10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided to the petitioner.” 2. The prayer made in the present petition appears to be defective one as has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondents that the rules has not been challenged and only the amendment is challenged in the petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh with proper prayer. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file it afresh with proper prayer and pleadings. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil