APHC010141812020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8555/2020 Between: 1. AKKINENI VISHNU VARDHANA RAO, S/O. SURYAPRAKASA RAO AGE. 62, DHARMAJIGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ADABALA VEERRAJU, S/O. VENKATA RAO AGE. 46, ADDRESS. DHARMAJIGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYATIRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. DHARMAJIGUDEM GRAMAPANCHAYAT, DHARMAJIGUDEM GRAMAPANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY-CUM- PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, DHARMAJIGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the order in the form of notice dt. 05.05.2020 issued by 3rd respondent thereby directing the petitioners to stop gunny business within 48 hours, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and provisions of Andhra Pradesh Panchayatraj Act, 1994 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession over gunny stocks and incidental activities connected thereto, situated in the premises bearing assessment No. 2059 and 2060 in an extent of 754 sq. yards in RS No. 375 and 376/3 of Dharmajigudem Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITON NO.8555 OF 2020 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri T.Surya Chaitanya, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.09.2025 BSP 16 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.8555 of 2020 08.09.2025 BSP