SANJAY KUMAR AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAMAMI GANGEY RURAL WATER SUPPLY DEPTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/1612/2025 · 2025-02-10
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120872 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120872 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8287 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1612 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar And 12 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Namami Gangey Rural Water Supply Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Goswami Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard.
2. Appointment of the petitioners, who claim themselves to have been working in the Nigam, was cancelled vide order dated 17.09.1997.
3. Being aggrieved, the petitioners filed various writ petitions leading being Writ Petition No.35490 of 1997 In Re Pancham Ram & Ors vs Chief Engineer, U.P. Jal Nigam & Ors. Said writ petition was allowed vide order dated 26.11.1998, a copy of which is Annexure-4 to the petition.
4. Upon a challenge being raised to the said judgment by filing a Special Appeal No.64 of 1999 along with other special appeals, said special appeal was allowed vide order dated 10.10.2003, a copy of which is Annexure-5 to the petition, and the judgment of the writ court was set aside.
5. Now the petitioners are before this Court claiming that their representations in this regard are under active consideration with the respondents consequently it is prayed that the representations be
directed to be decided.
6. Once the termination order of the petitioners has already been scrutinized by this Court consequently there cannot be any occasion for opening up a settled matter by means of the instant petition as such no case for interference is made out.
7. The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench