Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8998 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1205 of 2025 With (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2025) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Anuj Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the Petitioners.
2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Ms. Asmi, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
4. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alongwith compounding application and the same is supported with the affidavits of petitioners and respondent no.3.
5. Petitioners, except petitioner no.2, as well as respondent no.3 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsel.
6. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought quashing of the impugned FIR No.275 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 under Sections 115(2), 190(2), 191(3), 351(2) & 352 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lodged by respondent no.3 at P.S. Jhabrera, District Haridwar. Further prayer has been made directing the respondent nos.1 & 2 not to arrest the petitioners in connection with aforesaid FIR.
7.
Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them.
8. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application and submits that some of the offences are not compoundable.
2025:UHC:8998
9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
10. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them.
11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The impugned FIR No.275 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 under Sections 115(2), 190(2), 191(3), 351(2) & 352 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 registered at P.S. Jhabrera, District Haridwar is hereby quashed.
12. Accordingly instant writ petition stands
disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
09.10.2025 Arti
ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.10.10 15:52:54 +05'30'