Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:13313] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3486 of 2025
------ Prakash Saw, age 40 years son of Late Chhotu Saw, R/o Seo Durga Mandir, Madhukam, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, Dist. Ranchi, UID-7161 0069 5781.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-02-05-2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P) P.S. Case No.636 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6), 311, 111(2)(b) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court to the Seizure list; the copy of which has been kept at page-17 onwards of the brief, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from Punam Devi, three 9 mm cartridges were recovered and from Nilam Devi, Rs.1,01,500/- has been recovered and only the signature of the petitioner has been obtained thereon. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.01.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.3205 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail
of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra O.P) P.S. Case No.636 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/