Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120852 (ALL)

KIRTI SINGH AND 21 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/999/2025 · 2025-02-06

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7651-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 999 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kirti Singh And 21 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pritish Kumar,Amal Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Pritish Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Praful Vashist, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned Standing Counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. If the revision of the petitioners against the demolition order has been filed within time and is pending or it has been filed belatedly but the delay in filing the same has been condoned by the revisional authority then during pendency of the revision, the premises which was the subject matter of the demolition order dated 13.04.2023 shall not be demolished and impugned notices shall not be given effect, this however, shall remain subject to the result of the revision. The revisional authority is directed to dispose of the revision at the earliest say within a period of three months as revision is a statutory remedy. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 6.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench