Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097902025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2472/2025 MS B B FOODS REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR SRI BISWAJIT BHOWMICK, AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS, SON OF SUBIMAL CHANDRA BHOWMICK, RESIDENT OF HARULONGPHER, GOVERNMENT COLONY, WARD NO. 10, LUMDING, DISTRICT - HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN - 782447.
2: SRI BISWAJIT BHOWMICK SON OF SUBIMAL CHANDRA BHOWMICK RESIDENT OF HARULONGPHER GOVERNMENT COLONY WARD NO. 10 LUMDING DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN -782447 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, DEPARTMENT/MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001 2:DIRECTOR (TOURISM AND CATERING) RAILWAY BOARD
RAIL BHAWAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI110001.
3:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAYS THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN - 781011
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 4:CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN - 781011 ASSAM 5:SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782447.
6:DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER (TC) NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782447.
7:DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER COMMERCIAL NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISION LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782447.
8:ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL MANAGER
NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782447 9:GUJARAT CO OPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT FIRST FLOOR HOUSEFED COMMERCIAL COMPLEX RUKMINIGAON GS ROAD GUWAHATI ASSA
Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BANERJEE, MR. N SARKAR,MR SUBHRAJIT SAIKIA,MR BHUBAN SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 09.05.2025
Mr. N. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their grievance. Mr. H. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 8 submits that he has got no objection to the same. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant