Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8875 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 08TH OCTOBER, 2025
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1775 of 2025 Shiva Saini and Others
.....Applicants Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents
Counsel for the Applicant s : Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt,
Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, No.1
Brief Holder. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Mehul Joshi, No.2/informant-victim
Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present Application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.869 of 2025, “State Vs. Purushottam and Others”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 1
2025:UHC:8875
2. Heard Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent no.1 and Mr. Mehul Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2- informant/victim. 3. Applicants-accused are present through video conferencing. They are identified by Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate. The respondent no.2-Smt. Vaishali Saini- informant, is present through video conferencing. She is identified by Mr. Mehul Joshi, Advocate. 4. Applicant no.1 is the husband of the respondent no.2. Applicant no.2 is the father and the applicant no.3 is the mother of the applicant no.1. 5. The applicants and the respondent no.2 submitted that there were matrimonial disputes. They have settled their disputes. They have filed a Compounding Application (IA No.01 of 2025) and affidavits with their free will and without any pressure. 6. The respondent no.2 has requested to quash the entire proceedings of the said Criminal Case No.869 of 2025. 7. The said request of the respondent no.2 has not been opposed by the respondent no.1. 2
2025:UHC:8875
8. Considering the totality of the matter, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met if the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.869 of 2025,
“State Vs. Purushottam and Others”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar, are quashed. 9. Resultantly, the present Application filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is allowed and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.869 of 2025, “State Vs.
Purushottam and Others”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar, are hereby quashed. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt:08.10.2025 Neha
3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038 ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB967706845 2F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487 B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.10.08 20:10:06 +05'30'