IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50361 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-711 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1. Himanshu Singh @ Sanni Singh S/o- Vinod Kumar Singh Resident of village- Behara, P.S. Kerakat, District- Jaunpur, U.P 2. Vinod Kumar Singh S/o- Nand Lal Singh Resident of village- Behara, P.S. Kerakat, District- Jaunpur, U.P ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bajrang Khetan S/o- Late Jagdish Khetan Village- House No-12, Flat No-32, Sidharth Naresh Bihar-2, Virdopur Ps- Bhelupur Dist- Varanasi, U.P, A/P- Mesarsh Ganpat Rai Kewar Rai Trading Company Private Ltd. Karmanasha GT Road Near Maharaja Line Hotel P.S.- Durgawati District - Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.711 of 2019 for the offence under sections 420 and of the Indian Penal Code and under section 138 of the N.I. Act. 3. The petitioners are accused of issuing a Cheque of Rs.44,69,5000/- in favour of the complainant which has bounced. 4. From perusal of the records, it appears that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50361 of 2025(5) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 the petitioner no.2 has not issued the cheque and he is an old person aged about 72 years. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. 5. Let the petitioner no.2, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below, in connection with Complaint Case No.711 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down in section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / section 482 of the BNSS. 6. So far as the bail of petitioner no.1 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail since he has issued the said cheque which has been bounced. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed with respect to above named petitioner no.1 7. This bail application is partly allowed. pawan/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T