HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16043/2013 Moolchand son of Ladu, aged about 75 years, resident of Village Korjevar, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus PROFORMA RESPONDENTS:- 1. Board of Revenue, Ajmer. 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Dudu, District Jaipur. DEFENDANTS NO. 1 TO 7/ RESPONDENTS NO. 3 TO 9:- 3. Mohni Devi wife of Juvrilal, 4. Mahesh adopted son of Juvrilal, Both resident of Village Korjevar, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur. 5. Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Maujmabad, District Jaipur. 6. State of Rajasthan through Tehsildar, Maujmabad, District Jaipur. 7. Ghanshyam son of Chavanddan,resident of Plot No. 2, New Colony, Path No. 2, Sikar Road, Jaipur. 8. Kailash Singh son of Akshay Singh resident of Singodari, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar. 9. Ramsingh HUF through Karta Ramsingh S/o Late Gangadan, R/o Charan ki Dhani, Post Parshurampura, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anshulika Pareek for Mr.Kapil Bardhar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/07/2025 At the outset, counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that the original suit filed by the plaintiff-petitioner has been rejected by the Court of Assistant Collector (Fast Track), Dudu District Jaipur vide judgment and decree dated 13.01.2014, hence (2 of 2) [CW-16043/2013] under these circumstances, the present writ petition has become infructuous. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/40