Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010097742019 2025:GAU-AS:1235 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/127/2019 LACHIT NATH AND ANR. S/O LT. JAGADISH NATH, R/O VILL. HOWLY TOWN (WARD NO. 1), P.O AND P.S. HOWLY, DIST.-BARPETA, ASSAM 2: NABAJIT NATH S/O LT. JAGADISH NATH R/O VILL. HOWLY TOWN (WARD NO. 1) P.O AND P.S. HOWLY DIST.-BARPETA ASSA VERSUS AJIT NATH AND 4 ORS S/O LT. BRAJAGOPAL NATH, R/O VILL. HOWLY, P.S. BARPETA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM 2:JAYANTA NATH S/O LT. BRAJAGOPAL NATH R/O VILL. HOWLY P.S. BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM 3:HAREKRISHNA NATH S/O LT. BRAJAGOPAL NATH R/O VILL. HOWLY P.S. BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM 4:RENUBALA NATH W/O LT. BRAJAGOPAL NATH R/O VILL. HOWLY Page No.# 2/4 P.S. BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM 5:KRISHNA KINAR NATH S/O LT. KAMESHWAR NATH R/O VILL. HOWLY P.S. BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM 5.1:CHARU BALA NATH W/O LATE KRISHNA KINKAR NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.2:ON THE DEATH OF RAJANI NATH HIS LEGAL HEIRS S/O LATE KRISHNA KINKAR NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.2.1:DIPAK NATH S/O LATE RAJANI NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.2.2:HEMANGA NATH S/O LATE RAJANI NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.2.3:JITU NATH S/O LATE RAJANI NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA Page No.# 3/4 DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.3:ARABINDA NATH S/O LATE KRISHNA KINKAR NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.4:JITEN NATH S/O LATE KRISHNA KINKAR NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 5.5:PRAFULLA NATH S/O LATE KRISHNA KINKAR NATH R/O VILLAGE- HOWLY P.S. AND P.O- BARPETA DIST.-BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. A. Choudhury, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 05.02.2025 Mr. R. A. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners submitted that the instant revision application has become infructuous. Page No.# 4/4 2. Accordingly, the instant revision application stands closed as it has become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant