IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4841 of 2024 Decided on: 11.07.2025 ____________________________________________________ Jan Chetna Jagrukta Sanyukat Sangharsh Samiti ……….. petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. : Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ____________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw the petition, at this stage, as he has received certain important information and would like to place the same by a substantive petition. He, therefore, prays that liberty be granted to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. Prayer being 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 reasonable and one causing no prejudice to the respondents or affecting their rights, is allowed. 2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 11th July, 2025 tarun