Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12074 (GAU)

DR. SHAILENDRA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/3400/2022 · 2025-05-27

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097542022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3400/2022 DR. SHAILENDRA KUMAR COMDT, S/O- LATE JAGESHWAR PRASAD SHAH, CH CRPF, AMERIGOG, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781022. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. THROUGH ITS HOME SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE HOME SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001. 3:DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTORATE GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG-793010. 4:DIRECTOR GENERAL DIRECTORATE GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE BLOCK NO. 1 C.G.O. COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110003. 5:ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL (MED.) Page No.# 2/3 (CAPFS NSG AND AR) WEST BLOCK-1 WING-3 LEVEL-2 R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI-110066. 6:IG (MED)/MS COMPOSITE HOSPITAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781023 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR, MRS P RAI,MR H BEZBARUA,B SARMA,MS. S. SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR. A K DUTTA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 28-05-2025 Heard Mr. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.K. Dutta, learned CGC for the respondents. Mr. A.K. Dutta, learned CGC by placing the communication dated 12th August, 2024 from AC (LAW) NES at GC Gty submits that the respondent authority has already accepted the voluntary retirement of the petitioner and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. Having considered that the challenge made in this writ petition is to the transfer and posting of the petitioner and by now the petitioner has gone on voluntary retirement as well Page No.# 3/3 as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, no live issue remains to be adjudicated. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant