Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120731 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/912/2025 · 2025-02-06

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7693-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 912 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Tiwari,Smt. Usha Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming that the order passed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has not been complied. The petitioner should approach the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate. If nothing happens thereafter, he should file a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. At this stage, learned standing counsel says that Patthar Nasab has been done. If it is so, the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate should communicate this to the petitioner in writing within a week. Thereafter, if aggrieved, the petitioner may avail the remedies as may be prescribed in law. 4. The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 6.2.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench