SANJEEV PADHA v. MAJID KHALIL DRABU LEGAL INCHARGE JOINT CONTROLLERLEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT
CCP(S)/188/2024 · 2025-09-30
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12069 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12069 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 59 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 188/2024 in SWP No. 32/2018
Sanjeev Padha …. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Majid Khalil Drabu …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 30.09.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the judgment dated 09.01.2018 passed by this Court in SWP No. 32/2018 stands complied within in letter and spirit.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three consecutive dates of hearing i.e., on 13.08.2025, 30.06.2025 and 29.04.2025. Today also, none appeared on his behalf. It appears that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed or he is not interested to pursue this petition.
Accordingly, the proceedings in this contempt petition are closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition, if cause still survives.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
Judge JAMMU RAM MURTI/PS 30.09.2025