SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/940/2025 · 2025-01-31
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120658 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120658 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6762-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 940 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Govt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sewak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard.
2. We asked learned counsel for the petitioner to show as how he is aggrieved by an entry in the family register pertaining to family of Late Janardhan Rai son of Ramanuj Rai resident of Village-Basaratpur, Post-Gotha, District- Mau, he could not satisfy us at all. This is not a public interest litigation. Petitioner has to satisfy the Court of his locus and he should be aggrieved in some measure to maintain this petition.
3. We, accordingly, dismiss this petition on account of failure of the petitioner to show as to how he is aggrieved. This, however, shall not mean that we have condoned or approved of any entry in the family register aforesaid which may otherwise be illegal and our order shall not come in the way of authorities if any such proceedings for correction etc is initiated. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench