1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 905 of 2025 • Ankush Kumar Agarwal S/o Premchand Agarwal Aged About 34 Years R/o Main Road Near S.B.I Rajpur, Police Station And Tehsil Rajpur, Dist. Balrampur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rajpur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2. The Manager, State Bank Of India, Branch Rajpur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3. The Manager, Union Bank Branch Rajpur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4. The Manager, District Cooperative Bank Branch Rajpur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anushri Mishra, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Niraj Sharma, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 11/03/2025 1. By way of this petition, petitioner is not challenging any particular order but seeking direction to respondent no.1 to decide the unregistered application u/s 133 of Cr.P.C which is registered case (Ankush Agrawal vs. The Manager State Bank of VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.03.26 11:47:39 +0530 2 India Branch) file by the petitioner against the respondent no. 2 to 4 which is still pending till date. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner's house and shop are situated at village main road Rajpur. Petitioner's and his family member reside in that house and they also run shop i.e. Mukesh Traders. Near petitioner house and shop respondent no. 2 to 4 Banks are there and there is no any parking and toilet arrange by the respondent no. 2 to 4 for their customer therefore lots of customers park there vehicle i.e. two wheeler four wheelers in front of petitioner house and shop therefore petitioner having more difficulties to enter his house and run the shop. The customer of the respondent no. 2 to 4 are spreading filching in front of petitioner house and shop. The respondent no. 2 to 4 have not constructed urinals and toilets due to this, his customers are urinating on the walls of the petitioner shop and house, due to which foul smell and dirt has spread at the spot. Due to the above situation, the health of the petitioner's family members as well as the general public is being adversely affected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner moved an application under Section 133 of Cr.P.C before the respondent No.1 in the year 2024, which is still pending. He made a limited prayer to expedite the trial pending before the concerned trial Court. 4. To the limited prayer that the petitioner has made, is not opposed by the learned State Counsel. 3 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for petitioner and looking to his limited prayer, the instant CrMP is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section 133 of Cr.P.C expeditiously, if there is no legal impediment. 6. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE vaishali