PRITAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. HOME DEPTT. SECTT. LKO
NABAIL/100/2025 · 2025-02-05
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7505 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 100 of 2025 Applicant :- Pritam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Home Deptt. Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raghunath Prasad Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Sri Raghunath Prasad, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant by way of filing vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.361 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115, 352, 351(3), 109, 61(2) (a) B.N.S., Police Station Bilgram, District Hardoi. From perusal of the F.I.R. as well as the record, it transpires that the applicant is named in the F.I.R. and further the injured has also named the applicant and he has received serious injuries.
Learned counsel for the applicant has also failed to satisfactorily substantiate that the applicant would not tamper the evidences and would not threaten the witnesses. Apprehension of arrest has also been denied. Considering the complicity of the accused and the gravity of offence, this Court do not find any good ground to intervene in this matter. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 5.2.2025 Ram Murti Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench