Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2813-2001 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 05.04.2025 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ... PETITIONER V/S SUBHASH CHAND
... RESPONDENT CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: None. * * * LAPITA BANERJI
, J. (ORAL)
Notice was issued to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. It appears from the office report that Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner was informed vide letter dated March 26, 2025. Mr. Dinesh Goyal, Advocate, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has written back to the Department stating that as per his knowledge the respondent had expired long back and there are no legal representatives of the respondent as he was unmarried. Therefore, the learned counsel could not take any further instructions. In view of the office report filed on behalf of the respondent, CR- 2813-2001 is dismissed as infructuous. Liberty to apply. Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed of. 05.04.2025 (LAPITA BANERJI) Janki JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.04.09 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh