OBAID ALI KHAN v. GB PANT UNIVERSITY AND TECHNOLOGY
WPMS/2691/2024 · 2025-05-16
Alok Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12056 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12056 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4034
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
16th MAY, 2025
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO.2691 of 2024
Obaid Ali Khan
..…Petitioner
Versus
G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology and Another
..…Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep
Kothari, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. Shubhang
Dobhal, Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 27/28th August 2024 issued by the office of Registrar GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, qua the petitioner whereby, the petitioner on the allegations of using unfair means during semester examination has been debarred for the academic year 2023-24. (Contained as Annexure no.2 to this petition), (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to provisionally appear and persue 1
2025:UHC:4034 B.Tech 7th Semester IVth year and onwards course for the academic session 2024-25. (iii) Issue any other and further order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Award costs of the petition to the petitioner.”
2. Heard Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for respondents. 3. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate, submitted that the present matter is covered by the judgment dated 02.11.2023, passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1612 of 2023, “Dipesh Phulera Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and Others”, and, in WPMS No.1650 of 2023, “Himanshu Raj Vs. G.B. Pant University and Others”. 4. The said submission has not been disputed by the learned counsel appearing of the respondents. 5. With the consent of both the parties, the present Writ Petition (M/S No.2691 of 2024) is disposed of in terms of the said judgment dated 02.11.2023, passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1612 of 2023, “Dipesh Phulera Vs. G.B. Pant 2
2025:UHC:4034 University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and Others”, and, in WPMS No.1650 of 2023, “Himanshu Raj Vs. G.B. Pant University and Others”.
___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Date:16.05.2025 Neha
3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d 0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960 BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.05.16 18:03:27 +05'30'