Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12056 (AP)

DIVI NARAYANAMMA v. TANIKONDA PADMAVATHAMMA

SA/668/2003 · 2025-02-12

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE ^ c: PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 668 OF 2003 Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 31-03-2003 passed in A.S No. 10 of 1999 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kandukur, Prakasam District, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 23-11-1998 passed in OS No.47 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kandukur, Prakasam District. Between: Divi Narayanamma, W/o.Late Kondaiah, aged about 67 years, R/o.At Kandukur Town, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND 1. Tanikonda Padmavathamma, W/o.Venkata Narasaiah, aged about 47 years, Dubagunta Village, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Tanikonda Audemma (Died), R/o.At Dubagunta Village, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents/Defendants I.A. NO: 2 OF 2003 tCMP. NO: 24019 OF 2003) Between: Tanikonda Padmavathamma, W/o.Venkata Narasaiah, aged about 47 years Dubagunta Village, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.1 AND 1. Divi Narayanamma, W/o.Late Kondaiah, aged about 67 years R/o.KandukurTown & Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents/Petitioner 2. Tanikonda Audemma (Died) (R2 not necessary party) ...Respondent/Respondent No.2 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Order dated 07-08-2003 passed in CMP.No.14225 of 2003 in SA.No.668 of 2003. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP. NO: 14225 OF 2003) Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the Decree in O.S.No.47 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kandukur dated 23.11.1998 as confirmed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kandukur in A.S.No.10 of 1999, dated 31.3.2003, pending disposal of the above SA. Counsel for the Appellant :Smt. Chintalapudi Lakshmi Kumari (No representation) Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Sri Turaga Sai Surya Counsel for the Respondent: Sri D. Vevekananda Patnaik The Court made the following: APHC010141512003 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 668/2003 IN [3369] THE Between; ...appellant Divi Narayanamma AND ...RESPONDENT Tanikonda Padmavathamma Counsel for the Appellant; 1.CH1NTALAPUDI LAKSHMl KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent; 1. D VIVEKANANDA PATNAIK 2.TURAGA SAl SURYA The Court made the following JUDGMENX- filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the This Second Appeal was 1. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure dated 31.03.2003 passed in A.S.No.10 of 1999 on the Kandukur, confirming the judgment and Judgment and decree file of learned Senior Civil Judge O.S.No.47 of 1991 on the file of learned decree, dated 23.11.1998 passed in Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kandukur ■2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the no representation on The matter was subsequently passed over at respondents is present. 2.15 P.M. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However there shall be no order as to costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand. closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kandukur, Prakasam District. (With records) 2. The Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kandukur, Prakasam District. 3. One CC to Smt. Chintalapudi Lakshmi Kumari Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri D. Vivekananda Patnaik Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Turaga Sai Surya, Advocate [OPUC] 6. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. 7. Three CD Copies BSV Cnr HIGH COURT BSV DATED;12/02/2025 JUDGMENT ^ SA.No.668 of 2003 2 ^ FEB 2025 . Current Section ^ —-r:; V55' DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS