[2025:RJ-JP:12863] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2157/2011 Smt. Neha Chauhan W/o Ranjeet Singh D/o Shri Manohar Singh Chauhan Aged about 20 Years, R/o of Sundar Nagar- Beawar District – Ajmer (Rajasthan) at present R/o Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer, Dist. Ajmer. 3. The Station House Officer (SHO) P.S. Beawer City, Dist. Ajmer. 4. The Station House Officer (SHO) P.S. Beawer Sadar, Dist. Ajmer. 5. Shri Manohar Singh Chauhan, R/o of Sundar Nagar- Beawar District – Ajmer (Rajasthan). 6. Collector, District, Ajmer (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma(Ganthola) For Respondent(s) : Ms. Suman Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 20/03/2025 1. Instant writ petition was filed by and on behalf of petitioner way back on 10.02.2011 seeking following prayer:- "(i) That the entire record pertaining to this case may kindly be recalled. (ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents authorities (administrative and police authorities) may be directed to ensure that petitioner and her husband who have entered into marriage may not be illegally detained, harassed or threatened or subjected to any kind of violence so as to create disturbance to lead their matrimonial life peacefully and neither the petitioner nor her husband nor parents in- laws of petitioner and relatives of petitioner's husband are harassed in any manner in this regard and: (iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent 4 may kindly be directed to drop the proceedings initiated on [2025:RJ-JP:12863] (2 of 2) [CW-2157/2011] the complaint of respondent no.4, if any in relation to marriage of petitioner with her husband Shri Ranjeet Singh and any other report/complaint in this regard against petitioner or her husband may be ordered to be dropped. (iv) By an appropriate writ order or direction any other appropriate relief to which the petitioner is found entitled to may also kindly be granted in his favour. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the writ petition may kindly be allowed as prayed hereinabove. " 2. Counsel for the petitioner, having instructions from the petitioner, submits that with passage of time, relief prayed for in the writ petition has rendered infructuous, therefore, petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. Respondents have no objection. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /196