SUNIL KUMAR VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. (MINISTRY OF EDUCATION ) NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/1299/2025 · 2025-01-30
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120527 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6187 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1299 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Verma Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. (Ministry Of Education ) New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1 has been accepted by the office of the Deputy Solicitor General of India. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided at this stage. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2024, a copy of which is annexure 9 to the writ petition with regard to change of the name of the petitioner from Sonal Kumar Verma to Sunil Kumar Verma.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner has already represented the matter before the respondent No.3 on 22.10.20124 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.10.2024 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that his Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench