RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1210/2025 · 2025-01-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120518 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120518 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5699 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1210 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Shukla,Anand Tripathi,Vishal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri P.K. Singh, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and Dr. Manoj Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4.
2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of.
3. The instant petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.01.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from office of District Panchayat Raj Officer, Lucknow to District Panchayat, Sant Kabir Nagar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length prays that in this regard he may be permitted to submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievances and the respondent No.1 be
directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a specified time to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
5. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance within a period of two weeks from today before
the respondent No.1, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking
order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 28.1.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench