Veeram Reddy Veera Reddy v. Parlapalle Gangi Reddy @ Nallanna
SA/933/2003 · 2025-03-28
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12050 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12050 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010141672003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 933/2003
Between:
1. VEERAM REDDY VEERA REDDY, S/O.VEERA REDDY PALETI REDDY DRIVER FORMERLY RESIDING AT AGASTHYA LINGAYAPALI VILLAGE HAMLET OF THURAKAPALLY VILLAGE, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.9/245-3.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. PARLAPALLE GANGI REDDY NALLANNA, S/o.GANGI REDDY CULTIVATION RESIDING AT KOTHAPALLE HAMLET OF JAMBAPURAM VILLAGE AGASTHYA LINGAYAPALLI (POST) KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.
D RAGHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. C V BHASKAR REDDY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.933 OF 2003 J U D G M E N T:
None appeared for the appellant, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the appellant today, as well as on the previous adjournment.
2. Ms.B.V.Aparna Lakshmi, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for respondent No.7 would submit that the learned counsel for respondent No.7 was elevated as judge in High Court of Telangana State. None appeared for the respondent Nos.1 to 6.
3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
28.03.2025 Pmk
23
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL No.933 OF 2003
Date:28.03.2025 Pmk