VISHNU KUMAR S/O SOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3924/2025 · 2025-05-01
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18304] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3924/2025 Vishnu Kumar S/o Sohan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar Colony, Police Station Atalband, Bharatpur. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Jagdish Nagar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 01/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0060/2025 registered at Police Station-Atalbandh, District-Bharatpur for the offence under Section 376 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The FIR has been lodged with an inordinate delay of around three years. On the perusal of the FIR, it is an admitted fact that the victim has performed the marriage with the petitioner and resided with him around three years. Charge-sheet has been filed. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 03.03.2025. No fruitful purpose would be served keeping the petitioner in further custody. The trial of the case may take
[2025:RJ-JP:18304] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3924/2025] considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record, considering the admitted fact as mentioned in the FIR and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Vishnu Kumar S/o Sohan Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/192