Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120471 (ALL)

TILAKDHARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/870/2025 · 2025-01-29

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6053-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 870 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tilakdhari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. If there is a cause, the petitioner should file petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of our judgment dated 23.11.2024 passed in Writ C No. 10001 of 2024 (Vidya Vati Vs. District Magistrate District Amethi and Others) rather than writ petition under Artilce 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 29.1.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench