Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-65 IN TH 264
Labh Singh State of Hary
CORAM:
Present :
HARPREET
1.
of the Consti or order in th 04.01.2023 ( of interest fo declined in a in the nature the delayed p date of his re 1
6527-2023 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA
Date of
ingh VERSUS f Haryana and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Bagoria, Ad Khurana, Advocate for the petiti
Mr. Arun Singla, AAG, Haryana
Mr. Mayank Vashisht, Advoca Advocate for respondents No.2 t
**** REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
The present writ petition has be Constitution of India with a prayer for in the nature of certiorari for setting 023 (Annexure P-11) passed by resp rest for the delayed payments of retira d in an illegally and arbitrary manner nature of mandamus directing the res ayed payment of gratuity/leave encash his retirement till 19.03.2020.
NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH ate of Decision: November 04, 2025
CWP-6527-2023 .....Petitioner SUS
...Responden HARPREET SINGH BRAR ia, Advocate for Mr. Davinder Singh petitioner. aryana. dvocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, No.2 to 5.
has been filed under Article 226/227 er for issuance of an appropriate writ etting aside the impugned order dated y respondent No.2 whereby payment f retiral benefits to the petitioner was anner. Further for issuance of a writ the respondents to grant interest over encashment to the petitioner from the
2025
itioner ondents Singh hajan, 6/227 writ dated yment r was a writ t over m the PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.06 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-65
2.
for responde Committee h 2025 and all Committee.
3.
satisfied in c decided by E the Haryana rendered by t of Haryana titled as Ra 25.09.2025, b
4.
have no obje Redressal Co 2025, for tim present petiti
5.
counsel for t constituted u consider the 2
6527-2023
At this stage, learned State cou pondents No.2 to 5, submits that E ittee has been constituted under the H nd all these matters would be consi ittee.
Learned counsel for the petitio d in case the issue involved in the pre d by Employees Grievance Redressa ryana State Litigation Policy, 2025, ed by this Court in CWP-2457-2025 ana and others, decided on 30.07 Ranjit Singh vs State of Pun , by passing a speaking order in a
Learned counsel for the respond o objection, in case a direction is issu sal Committee constituted under the H or time-bound consideration and decis petition by passing a speaking order.
Therefore, in view of the lim l for the petitioner, the Employees G uted under the Haryana State Litigat the issue involved in the present pet
te counsel as well as learned counsel that Employees Grievance Redressal r the Haryana State Litigation Policy, considered and decided by the said petitioner submits that he would be the present petition is considered and dressal Committee constituted under 2025, in the light of the judgments 2025, titled as H.C. Sharma vs State 30.07.2025 and CWP-28761-2025 Punjab and others, decided on r in a time bound manner. spondents No.2 to 5 submits that the is issued to the Employees Grievance r the Haryana State Litigation Policy, d decision of the issue involved in the
order. he limited prayer made by learned yees Grievance Redressal Committee itigation Policy, 2025 is directed to ent petition and pass a speaking order
unsel ressal olicy, e said ld be d and under ments tate 2025, d on hey vance olicy, in the arned mittee ted to
order PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.06 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-65 in the light of after affordin 03 months fr the decision say, if the pe granted to him
6.
7.
disposed of.
November P.C
3
6527-2023 ight of H.C. Sharma’s case (supra) ffording an opportunity of hearing to t nths from the date of receiving a certif ision taken thereof shall be conveyed the petitioner is found entitled to the him forthwith.
Disposed of, accordingly.
Pending miscellaneous applica ed of. 04, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. :
ra) and Ranjit Singh’s case (supra) ng to the petitioner, within a period of a certified copy of this order. Further, nveyed to the petitioner. Needless to to the relief sought, the same shall be pplications, if any, shall also stand (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
ra), iod of rther, ess to all be stand RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.06 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document