IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7506/2025 Decided on: 27.05.2025 Parkash Chand Sharma & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Hemant Vaid, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General . Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:- 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 “It, is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition be allowed any by issuing an appropriate Writ Direction or Order the respondents be directed to pay the revised pay scale to the petitioners l.e. Rs.5480-8925 from the due date with its revisions from time to time. The respondents be further directed to revise the pension after calculating the same on the basis of the revised pay scale of Rs. 5480-8925 along with its revisions from time to time. The respondents be further direction to pay the arrears of the salary and pension due to the petitioners along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date when the amount fell due till the date of the actual payment is made to the petitioners. It is further further prayed that the respondents be directed to make the payment of the aforesaid amount to the petitioners within a time bound period. The respondents be further directed to produce all the relevant serve record of the petitioners and similarly situated teachers.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have preferred representations dated 25.11.2024 (Annexure P-2) and 26.11.2024 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents/competent authority, however, no concrete action on their representations has been taken till date. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. In view of above submission, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to 3 consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 27, 2025(rohit)