Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12043 (UTT)

TARANNUM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2242/2021 · 2025-07-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6332 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2242 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation either for the petitioner or for the respondent No.3. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G .with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. Learned State Counsel, on instruction, submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 24.07.2022. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present criminal writ petition and it has rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate forum in appropriate proceedings, if so advised. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.07.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f 0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D 84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.07.21 16:22:45 +05'30'