Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120417 (ALL)

M/S VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION THRU. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.ADITYA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT,LKO. AND ANOTHER

/508/2025 · 2025-01-31

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6744 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 508 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Vocational Educational Foundation Thru. Authorized Representative Mr.Aditya Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infrastructure And Industrial Development,Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Kartikey Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sachin Upadhyay Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Kartikey Dubey, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Radhika Kheria, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Sachin Upadhyay, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2. 2. By means of this writ petition, prayer has been made for directing respondent No.1 i.e. the State to decide the revision petition said to have been preferred by the petitioner, dated 17.02.2024, expeditiously. 3. Having regard to the innocuous nature of prayer made in this petition, the writ petition is disposed off with the consent of parties with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition preferred by the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. 4. It is also provided that the application dated 17.02.2024 seeking grant of interim relief moved by the petitioner shall also be decided within a period of three weeks from today, and till the decision of the application for interim relief, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents. 5. It is made clear that on passing of appropriate orders in the revision as directed above, the protection granted by this Court shall cease to operate. 6. It is further directed that the respondent shall file a reply if they intend to do so within two weeks. 7. The respondent authority shall also file their reply as sought in the pending revisional proceedings. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench