AVANISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/1206/2025 · 2025-01-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120411 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120411 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5733 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1206 of 2025 Petitioner :- Avanish Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Laxmi Sewak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Shivam Sharma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press on with the writ petition so far as it pertains to the petitioner No.2 and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn so far as it pertains to the petitioner No.2 with the liberty as aforesaid.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 & 3 and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the father of the petitioner namely Shri Deep Chandra Yadav having died on 22.11.2019, the gratuity, which was payable to him, has still not been paid till date to the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length prays that in this regard he may be permitted to submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent No.4 for redressal of his grievances and the respondent no.4 be
directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a
specified time to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
6. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance before the respondent no.4, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 28.1.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench