Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6097-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 895 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amrendra Kumar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambrish Kumar Dwivedi,Abhishek Dwivedi,Mansi Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brajendra Amiy Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Vakalatnama filed by Ms. Atiya Abid, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 is taken on record. Heard. The petitioner borrower has challenged the order passed by the Additional City Magistrate IV, Lucknow under Section 14 of the S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act, 2002. A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. The petitioner may avail the remedy under Section 17 of the S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act, 2002. However, at this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner says that he is ready to pay the entire due amount to the Bank, and in this regard, he has relied upon a decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court dated 17.10.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No. 6843 of 2023 arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 16771 of 2018. If it is so, it is for the Bank to consider the said request. He may approach the Bank concerned and it is for the Bank to consider the request. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 29.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench