Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12039 (CHH)

MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. THANENDRA YADAV (MINOR)

MCC/250/2025 · 2025-03-10

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11744 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 250 of 2025 Manager The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Regional Office Bhilai Shivnath Complex G.E. Road Supela Bhilai Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Applican versus 1 - Thanendra Yadav (Minor) S/o Mukund Yadav Aged About 15 Years Minor Through His Guardian Mother Smt. Uma Yadav, W/o Mukund Yadav Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Shastri Nagar Camp - 1 Bhiali Ward No. 18 Police Station Chhawani Bhilai Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ashok Jaiswal S/o Mewalal Jaiswal Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Karha Post And Police Station Mohmadabad, District Ajamgarh (U.P.) Now R/o Quarter No. 3/c Road No. 11 Sector - 11 Zone - 1 Khursipar Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramprasad Tiwari S/o Vindhychal Tiwari Aged About 43 Years R/o Quarter No. 3/ C Road No. 11 Sector - 11 Zone - 1 Khursipar Bhilai Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Akash Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : None (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 10/03/2025 1) Heard. 2) This MCC is filed for modification of order dated 25.09.2024 passed by this Court in MAC no. 683 of 2019. 2 3) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the enhanncement of the same has been decided vide order dated 25.09.2024 passed by this Court in MAC no. 683/2019 whereby the award amount has been enhanced to Rs. 49,740, thereby entitling the appellant/claimant for a total compensation of Rs. 2,11,000/-. The marginal enhancement of compensation after deducting the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal come to Rs. 49,740. However, in para 13 of the order of this Court due to some typographical error, it is recorded that “and after deducting the same, enhanced compensation would come to Rs. 2,11,000/- whereas in fact, it ought to have been Rs. 49,740. 4) Consequently, it is ordered that the amount Rs.2,11,000/- mentioned in para 13 of order dated 25.09.2024 shall now be read as Rs. 49,740. 5) Accordingly, MCC stands disposed of. 6) A copy of this order shall be made part of MAC and a copy of the same be also supplied along with order dated 25.09.2024. 7) CC as per rules. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE alfiza