Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6399 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 927 of 2025 Applicant :- Wajid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- O.P. Tiwari,Jitendra Kumar Singh,Pallavi Vatsala Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aditya Kumar Bajpai Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Shri Aditya Kumar Bajpai, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant by filing vakalatnama and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Aditya Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the complainant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 440 of 2024, under Sections 115(2),352,351,333,3(5),92 B.N.S., Police Station- Shahabad, District- Hardoi. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant matter due to ulterior motive. He submits that general role has been assigned in the FIR lodged by the complainant, whereas the injured has assigned the specific role to one co- accused Talib who is said to be kicked to the injured. He added that after receiving injury of kicks, the foetus was aborted and thus, the main allegation is against the said co-accused Talib not against the applicant. He next added that the role of the present applicant is distinguishable from the role of the co-accused Talib. He further submits that charge-sheet has been filed and as such, there is no possibility that the applicant would tamper with the evidences or would threaten the witnesses. He also submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 10.12.2024. Further submitted that the applicant undertakes that in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the complainant has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submits that the applicant is named in the FIR and all the accused persons including the applicant were involved in committing the aforesaid offence and thus, he is not entitled for any relief. Learned AGA appearing for the State has also supported the version of the counsel for the complainant. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.12.2024; the main allegation is against the co-accused Talib not against the applicant; the role of the present applicant is distinguishable from the role of the co-accused Talib; charge-sheet has been filed and as such, there is no possibility that the applicant would tamper with the evidences or would threaten the witnesses; there is no previous criminal history of the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that if he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Considering the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. Let the applicant- Wajid involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial; (2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. He shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code; (3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and (4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench