1 APHC010140872017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4774 OF 2017 Between: 1. K.V.L. Naga Raju, S/o. K. Narsimha Raju, Aged about 46 years, R/o. 83, 1st Floor, Kesavayani Gunta, Near SGS Arts College, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Board of Trustees, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to quash the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Roc.No.B2/I 0389/2013 dated 10.11.2016 whereby the punishment imposed by the 2nd respondent in Roc.No.DA3/6494/2011, dated 09.05.2013 is confirmed and to issue a consequential direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner to the next higher post of Superintendent from the date of promotion of his immediate junior, G. Jaya Kumar with all consequential benefits and seniority and pass such 2 other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: AMRUTHA BOPPUDI Counsel for the Respondents:A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.4774 of 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following main relief: “to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to quash the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Roc.No.B2/I 0389/2013 dated 10.11.2016 whereby the punishment imposed by the 2nd respondent in Roc.No.DA3/6494/2011, dated 09.05.2013 is confirmed and to issue a consequential direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner to the next higher post of Superintendent from the date of promotion of his immediate junior, G. Jaya Kumar with all consequential benefits and seniority and pass …..” 2. When the matter came up for hearing, Smt.Priyanvitha, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission as sought for is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 18.07.2025 Rns 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.4774 of 2017 Date:18.07.2025 Rns