Vipan Raj vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another CMP-T No.183 of 2025 in Ex. Petition (T)No. 253 of 2024 07.05.2025 Present Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the non- applicants/respondents. By way of instant application, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/ petitioner for revival/restoration of Execution Petition No.253 of 2024, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure A-1) on the basis of undertaking given by learned counsel for the non- applicants/ respondents that needful in terms of the judgment sought to be executed, if not already done, shall be done within a period of four weeks. Since needful has not been done, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings for revival of the execution petition. Before cognizance of the averments made in the application could be taken, Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned counsel representing the respondents, made available communication dated 06.05.2025. He states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, gratuity amounting to Rs. 3,66,400/-, leave encashment amounting to Rs. 304564/-, DCRG interest amounting to Rs. 42621/- and leave encashment interest amounting Rs. 43070/- has been paid to the petitioner vide cheques, details whereof are given in the aforesaid communication. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present application and accordingly, same is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge May 07, 2025 (shankar)