RAJENDRA PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS v. ANJALI PANDAY CIVIL JUDGE HAVELI (JUNIOR DIVISION) LUCKNOW
CAPL/226/2025 · 2025-03-05
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120229 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13578 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 226 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Anjali Panday Civil Judge Haveli (Junior Division) Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Verma,Saima Khan Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. The case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made for adjournment of the case.
3. On the other hand Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel representing the High Court and the Subordinate Courts on the basis of the instructions received from the respondent (which is taken on record) has submitted that in compliance of the
judgment and order passed by the Writ Court dated 10.5.2024, the application has been decided by the order dated 17.02.2025, the copy of which has been enclosed along with the instructions.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the respondent and gone through the record, the Writ Court has passed judgement and
order dated 10.5.2024. The relevant extract of the judgment and order is quoted herein-below.
"6. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial Court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial Court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial Court is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable orders thereon.
7. With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of."
4. After perusal of the instructions provided during the course of argument it is found that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with.
5. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
6. Notice, if any, is hereby discharged
Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench