Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120216 (MAD)

K.Vasumathi v. The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP(MD)/1998/2024 · 2025-03-28

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 K.Vasumathi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, M.Kallupatti Police Station, Madurai District. 4. Thangaraj 5. Pappu @ Karuppaiya 6. Rajangam 7. Poovani @ Murugeshwari 8. Chokki @ Jeyalakshmi 9. Pandi ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 PRAYER: Criminal Original petitions have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd respondent to give a police protection for the petitioners life and limb based on the representation given by the petitioner dated 30.01.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. P.Praveenkumar For R1-R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4-R8 : Mr.S.Sivaprakash O R D E R This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to give a police protection for the petitioner based on the representation given by the petitioner dated 30.01.2024. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the representation of the petitioner was forwarded to the revenue officials to conduct a peace committee meeting. Based on the resolution passed in the peace committee meeting, they will consider the representation of the petitioner. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 3.The learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 8 would submit that there is a property dispute between the parties and police protection cannot be granted for a property dispute. 4.Since the representation of the petitioner has already been forwarded to the revenue officials, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the 3rd respondent after the completion of the proceedings before the revenue authorities. 5.With the above observations, this petition stands disposed of. 28.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, M.Kallupatti Police Station, Madurai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 P. DHANABAL, J. PNM ORDER IN Crl.O.P(MD)No.1998 of 2024 28.03.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis