Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12019 (CHH)

KHEEKRAM ANCHAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1380/2025 · 2025-03-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12240 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1380 of 2025 1 - Kheekram Anchal S/o Chheduram Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Basin P.S. Hasoud Tahsil Malkharouda District Sakti (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, Sakti Distt. Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) / Land Acquisition Officer Malkharoda, Distt. Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department (B/r) Sub Division Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, PL (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.03.12 17:48:50 +0530 2 12/03/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents’ authority for payment of compensation towards the petitioner’s land which has been utilized for construction of Basantpur- Parsada-Ghoghari Road. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who is owner of land bearing Khasra No. 114/11 area 0.64 acre situated at Village Basin, P.H.N. -32, R.N.M. Chhapora Tahsil Malkharouda, Distt. Sakti Out of the said land, 0.11 acre land has been utilized for construction of the said Road by the Public Works Department without acquisition of the land and even without making any payment towards compensation. He would further submit that the petitioner has submitted representation dated 11/12/2024 (Annexure-P/2) before the respondent authority, however, the same has not been decided till date and no compensation has been paid. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that respondent No.4/SDO (Revenue) shall examine the claim of the petitioner by making a spot inspection and demarcation of the land of the petitioner, and if it is found that the land of the petitioner has been used for construction of the said Road, then necessary steps shall be taken for payment of compensation in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, pleadings and the representations submitted by the petitioner. 5. Perusal of the demarcation report dated 03/07/2019 would show that the 3 Revenue Inspector has opined in his report that 0.11 acres of the petitioner’s land will be affected and without proper demarcation, he submitted the report to the Tahsildar. 6. Hence, the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) is directed to look into the matter by making a spot inspection and demarcation of land in question in presence of the petitioner and if it is found that the land of the petitioner comes within the road, take necessary steps for acquisition of the said land in accordance with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (henceforth ‘the Act, 213’), within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The SDO shall ensure that necessary compensation be paid to the petitioner towards his land which has been used for construction of the said road in accordance with the Act, 2013. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul