SMT. SAYARA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
A227/408/2025 · 2025-01-28
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5399 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 408 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sayara Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Seraj Ahmad Khan,Imtishal Shah Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents Nos.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.3 and 4 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Case No.T201904230300648 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.T201904230300648 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of
either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.1.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench