IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Regular Second Appeal No.436 of 2016 Date of decision: 1st July, 2025 Dhani Ram & others …Appellants Versus Jai Prakash & others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Appellants: None. (Appellants are stated to have expired). For the Respondents: Mr. Praveen Chandel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 3. Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, under instructions of learned original counsel Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, submits that on previous date, the matter was adjourned on request made on behalf of legal heirs of deceased appellants. But now, the legal heirs of deceased appellants are not coming forward to impart necessary instructions and to provide requisite assistance for taking appropriate steps on account of death of appellants as well as respondent No.2 and therefore, learned counsel earlier representing the appellants is not able to contest this appeal. 2 From above submissions, it appears that legal heirs are not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly appeal is dismissed being abated. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 1st July, 2025(MS) 2